食品安全风险和虐畜罪

牛奶国际(现为DFI零售集团):污染和食品安全风险

如果您平时在Cold Storage 或者 Giant 购物,建议您三思而后行。一项调查显示,牛奶国际(现为DFI零售集团)旗下的Cold Storage和 Giant 出售的鸡蛋来自于肮脏的迭层鸡笼,具有极高的食品安全风险。

经过对牛奶国际(现为DFI零售集团)的鸡蛋供应商进行调查发现,鸡舍产蛋栏上堆积着粪便和污垢结块,离鸡蛋和鸡仅咫尺之遥。母鸡的一生都被关在迭层鸡笼里。这种笼子又小又残忍,在世界上大多数国家都是非法的。除此之外,野生禽鸟在农场来去自由,造成了禽流感传播的严重风险。

几乎所有的亚洲大型跨国食品零售商都承诺只销售能够自由出笼的鸡产的蛋,包括City Super、Tesco、METRO、Aldi和Costco。但牛奶国际不同,它一直对外出售的是来自肮脏、残忍的迭层鸡笼的鸡蛋。

必须让牛奶国际(现为DFI零售集团)停止这种行为,这不仅无视食品安全对消费者造成的身体危害,还存在严重的虐待动物罪。牛奶国际必须符合行业标准,承诺只销售能够自由出笼的鸡产的鸡蛋。

请在请愿书上签名!

牛奶国际 (现为DFI零售集团):在您赶上其他领先的食品公司,并承诺停止使用肮脏残酷的电池笼的鸡蛋之前,我不会在您的任何商店(包括Giant和Cold Storage)购物。现在是牛奶国际承诺100%不用笼养鸡蛋的时候了!

    Egg safety - Food safety risks

    笼养鸡蛋的食物安全风险

    多过十项科学研究发现,笼养鸡蛋农场的沙门氏菌污染率,相对而然高很多。欧洲食品安全局对此问题进行了有史以来最大规模的研究,分析了五千个农场的数据。研究发现,笼养鸡蛋农场被关键沙门氏菌污染的可能性,高达25倍。(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17)

    有很多原因令笼子里的母鸡会引起食品安全风险。美国农业部的研究表明,母鸡在笼子里所承受的压力,会使其更容易患病。而且笼子也很难清洗和消毒,从而导致“大量受污染的粪便和灰尘”。(18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23)

    笼养鸡蛋是残酷的

    就像狗和猫一样,鸡是聪明,聪明的動物会感到愉悦和痛苦。因此,将动物几乎一生都装在笼子里,以至于她几乎无法转身,这完全是错误的。(24)

    电池笼是如此残酷,以至于全球数十个国家都禁止使用电池笼。 世界各地的每个主流动物保护组织都谴责电池笼残忍和不人道。(25, 26, 27)

    以下是一些组织所说的话:

    WAP「在這類雞場中【格子籠】,即使是拍翼或飛上枝頭棲息等最簡單的自然行為,雞隻也沒有可做的自由。。。愛護動物協會深切關注這數以百萬計雞隻的福利」香港愛護動物協會

    WAP

    「格子籠飼養蛋雞極不人道,不僅飼養密度高,也剝奪蛋雞洗沙浴、築巢。。。飲食產業也應開始選用友善雞蛋,讓台灣能夠盡快地跟上國際腳步,確保動物福利。」台灣防止虐待動物協會

    WAP

    「格子笼饲养蛋鸡极不人道,不仅饲养密度高,也剥夺蛋鸡洗沙浴、筑巢。。。饮食产业也应开始选用友善鸡蛋,让台湾能够尽快地跟上国际脚步,确保动物福利。 」台湾防止虐待动物协会

    These organisations are not associated with this website

    Battery Cage Photo 1 - Battery Cages

    电池笼

    牛奶国际继续向客户出售电池笼的鸡蛋,这些供应商将母鸡关在残酷肮脏的电池笼中

    Battery Cage Photo 2 - Dirty

    肮脏

    在新加坡的Cold Storage和Giant的鸡蛋供应商,死去的母鸡被丢进垃圾箱。

    Battery Cage Photo 3 - Animal Cruelty

    残忍

    牛奶国际鸡蛋供应商的工人粗略地处理鸟类,包括捡起它们的脖子

    下载和档案

    本网站上的所有视频片段和照片均属于公共领域,任何人(包括媒体)都可以免费下载和使用。 可从此处下载高品质的影片和照片,网站上所有影片和照片都是公开的,任何人(包括媒体)都可以免费下载和使用。

    此页面上显示的视频和照片是在周氏农场拍摄的,该农场是新加坡Giant and Cold Storage的主要供应商。

    可以在此处找到有关视频已在上述农场录制的证据,以及这些公司向牛奶国际的商店提供鸡蛋的文档。

    Equitas是总部位于英国的全球非营利组织,致力于保护全球食品供应链中的消费者和动物福利。

    有关电池笼的食品安全风险和滥用动物的行为的引用

    1: Van Hoorebeke S, Van Immerseel F, Schulz J, et al. 2010. Determination of the within and between flock prevalence and identification of risk factors for Salmonella infections in laying hen flocks housed in conventional and alternative systems. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 94(1-2):94-100.

    2: Snow LC, Davies RH, Christiansen KH, et al. 2010. Investigation of risk factors for Salmonella on commercial egg-laying farms in Great Britain, 2004-2005. Veterinary Record 166(19):579-86.

    3: 2010. Annual Report on Zoonoses in Denmark 2009. National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark.

    4: Van Hoorebeke S, Van Immerseel F, De Vylder J et al. 2010. The age of production system and previous Salmonella infections on farm are risk factors for low-level Salmonella infections in laying hen flocks. Poultry Science 89:1315-1319.

    5: Huneau-Salaün A, Chemaly M, Le Bouquin S, et al. 2009. Risk factors for Salmonella enterica subsp. Enteric contamination in 5 French laying hen flocks at the end of the laying period. Preventative Veterinary Medicine 89:51-8.

    6: Green AR, Wesley I, Trampel DW, et al. 2009 Air quality and bird health status in three types of commercial egg layer houses. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 18:605-621.

    7: Schulz J, Luecking G, Dewulf J, Hartung J. 2009. Prevalence of Salmonella in German battery cages and alternative housing systems. 14th International congress of the International Society for Animal Hygiene: Sustainable animal husbandry : prevention is better than cure. pp. 699-702. http://www.safehouse-project.eu/vars/fichiers/pub_defaut/Schulz_Salmonella_ISAH%202009.ppt.

    8: Namata H, Méroc E, Aerts M, et al. 2008. Salmonella in Belgian laying hens: an identification of risk factors. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 83(3-4):323-36.

    9: Mahé A, Bougeard S, Huneau-Salaün A, et al. 2008. Bayesian estimation of flock-level sensitivity of detection of Salmonella spp. Enteritidis and Typhimurium according to the sampling procedure in French laying-hen houses. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 84(1-2):11-26.

    10: Pieskus J, et al. 2008. Salmonella incidence in broiler and laying hens with the different housing systems. Journal of Poultry Science 45:227-231.

    11: European Food Safety Authority. 2007. Report of the Task Force on Zoonoses Data Collection on the Analysis of the baseline study on the prevalence of Salmonella in holdings of laying hen flocks of Gallus gallus. The EFSA Journal 97. www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/efsa_locale-1178620753812_1178620761896.htm.

    12: Snow LC, Davies RH, Christiansen KH, et al. 2007. Survey of the prevalence of Salmonella species on commercial laying farms in the United Kingdom. The Veterinary Record 161(14):471-6.

    13: Methner U, Diller R, Reiche R, and Böhland K. 2006. [Occurence of salmonellae in laying hens in different housing systems and inferences for control]. Berliner und Münchener tierärztliche Wochenschrift 119(11-12):467-73.

    14: Much P, Österreicher E, Lassnig. H. 2007. Results of the EU-wide Baseline Study on the Prevalence of Salmonella spp. in Holdings of Laying Hens in Austria. Archiv für Lebensmittelhygiene 58:225-229.

    15: Stepien-Pysniak D. 2010. Occurrence of Gram-negative bacteria in hens’ eggs depending on their source and storage conditions. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences 13(3):507-13.

    16: Humane Society International, “An HSI Report: Food Safety and Cage Egg Production” (2010). HSI Reports: Farm Animal Protection. 3. http://animalstudiesrepository.org/hsi_reps_fap/3

    17: European Food Safety Authority. 2007. Report of the Task Force on Zoonoses Data Collection on the Analysis of the baseline study on the prevalence of Salmonella in holdings of laying hen flocks of Gallus gallus. The EFSA Journal 97. www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/efsa_locale-1178620753812_1178620761896.htm

    18: The Danish Veterinary and Food Administration. 2004. The national Salmonella control programme for the production of table eggs and broilers 1996-2002. Fødevare Rapport 6, March.

    19: Davies R and Breslin M. 2003. Observations on Salmonella contamination of commercial laying farms before and after cleaning and disinfection. The Veterinary Record 152(10):283-7.

    20: Methner U, Rabsch W, Reissbrodt R, and Williams PH. 2008. Effect of norepinephrine on colonisation and systemic spread of Salmonella enterica in infected animals: Role of catecholate siderophore precursors and degradation products. International Journal of Medical Microbiology 298(5-6):429-39.

    21: Bailey MT, Karaszewski JW, Lubach GR, Coe CL, and Lyte M. 1999. In vivo adaptation of attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium results in increased growth upon exposure to norepinephrine. Physiology and Behavior 67(3):359-64.

    22: Shini S, Kaiser P, Shini A, and Bryden WL. 2008. Biological response of chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) induced by corticosterone and a bacterial endotoxin. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. Part B. 149(2):324-33.

    23: Rostagno MH. 2009. Can stress in farm animals increase food safety risk? Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 6(7):767-76.

    24: Marino, L. 2017. Thinking chickens: a review of cognition, emotion, and behavior in the domestic chicken. Animal Cognition 20(2): 127–147.

    25: “European_Union_Council_Directive_1999/74/EC.” Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Web 03 August 2018, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union_Council_Directive_1999/74/EC

    26: “Farm Animal Confinement Bans.” American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Web. 03 August 2018, www.aspca.org/animal-protection/public-policy/farm-animal-confinement-bans

    27: World Organization for Animal Health, “Terrestrial Animal Health Code” (2017). www.rr-africa.oie.int/docspdf/en/Codes/en_csat-vol1.pdf